![]() It doesn't make them somehow less worthy.just not experienced. Sometimes they are in one subject or another, but they aren't in life experience. If you talk down to them or treat them as stupid, they will disrespect you.Īs for being smarter than their parents? In what way? Most children believe they're smarter than their parents. Sounds like just one more way of making a group of people elitist.Īll children deserve and need respect, honesty, caring and kindness. I'm not sure I believe in the "indigo child". What do we use for criteria for brilliance? Academics? Lots of "average" students grow up to be business geniuses. The system then tends to treat them in a certain way based on where they fit. I dislike the term "above" or "below" average because it implies that there is a "norm" and children are then pigeon holed as to where they fit in this setup. It wasn't until I was walking across the classroom and saw his paper from a distance that I realized he had colored in a Mickey Mouse head with ears. The one who didn't spent the several hours drawing in the little circles in what I thought was a random pattern. With the exception of one child, they all did the same or better than their peers, statewide, on the standardized tests. had made up their deficiencies and were actually ahead of their grade peers. By the end of the school year, these children.every single one of them. Many of these children were literally failing out of the system and were considered "below average". In my first year as a teacher I was given the "dregs" (not my word) of the 3rd and 4th grade for my class. I would say your description describes most, if not all children. I've never heard the term "indigo child" before. By causing Columbine, they became a mirror showing our society to itself, and saying "We need to change this." Ironically, I think they achieved their purpose, though I doubt their souls had it planned that way. So they snapped and went on a killing spree, which then turned into their suicide. Everywhere they turned their purpose was being blocked. They were constantly being bullied and no one seemed to care. ![]() To start with, they were ignored by their parents. It would certainly explain how two exceptionally wise and caring children went on a rampage. Which made them about as likely to kill as Mahatma Ghandi or Martin Luther King Junior. They were said to be high-minded and idealistic, and hated racism, sexism, ageism, and similar isms and idiotic hatreds. I believe this because of something I read about the Columbine killers, Harris and Klebold. either by committing suicide or by getting rid of what they percieve to be blocking them. but if they constantly fail to do so, they psychologically implode or explode very violently. If they feel that their purpose in life (even if they don't consciously know what that purpose is) is being blocked or stopped, they will try to unblock it. So here I go, about the dark side of indigos: Respect, honesty, caring, kindness, and a democratic voice in the family are what they require. If you talk down to them or assume that they are stupid or ignorant because they are kids, they will disrespect you. They have a lot of energy, and they demand to be treated with the same kind of respect that is usually afforded adults. Quick definition of indigo children from a secular perspective: kids that are much smarter than average in at least one way, maybe even smarter than their parents not prodigies, but just very brilliant in one area or more. If they can mess up the old form of children, these new kids will be even worse for these people. I've been reading up on indigo children, and found something fascinating and scary, especially considering that many people have children because they think it's expected, but are not good parents.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |